Appeal decision tomorrow for men who raped 10-year-old

Tomorrow morning at 11 am EST, a decision will be made public by Queensland's Chief Justice, Paul de Jersey regarding whether the nine males who raped a 10 year old girl deserve harsher punishment. Judge Sarah Bradley ordered no convictions be recorded against the males and they all walked free from court which resulted in a massive backlash from the public.
Tomorrow could very well be a real Friday the 13th for those nine males and rightly so. What I would like to know, what happens to Judge Bradley? Does she receive a quiet whisper in the ear that she should of handled it better or will she have her own sorry ass hauled over the coals as she so rightly deserves also. I have no doubts that the legal fraternity of Cairns will back the Judge to the fullest. After seeing the same Judge direct a jury to find a not guilty verdict against a man in his 70's for indecent dealings with children under the age of 16 when he clearly was guilty and admitted to one count, her actions in this case do not surprise me. Bring on Friday the 13th and a recommendation of jail for those nine males and for Sarah Bradley, sack the bitch.

Judge Sarah Bradley's mistake

The Court of Appeal has refused an application to adjourn the hearing of an appeal against the sentences imposed on nine males who gang raped a 10-year-old girl at Aurukun on the Cape York Peninsula.

Late last year, a judge handed down non-custodial sentences to three men and six juveniles after they pleaded guilty to raping the girl in 2006.

The Attorney-General is appealing against the non-custodial sentences.

The rapists' lawyers yesterday asked the court for more time to consider pre-sentence and psychological reports on the three men.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/02/2233638.htm

Nine males raped a 10 year old girl and received non custodial sentences. Judge Sarah Bradley failed to hand down sentences that reflected on the nature of the crime. This story has been written about before and the counsel for the defendants asked that an appeal be pushed back to allow for psychiatric reports. What will be just as sad if these animals are allowed to offer a defense using psychiatric reports. They knew full well what they were doing when they pack raped a little girl and now trying every trick in the book to justify the leniency of Judge Bradley's sentencing. To use the excuse they come from a community that is rampant with alcohol fuelled violence is bullshit. It matters not that these males, you couldn't call them men, come from an aboriginal community. Rape is rape and knows no race or religion. It is appalling that one uses race, background etc to try and explain such a despicable thing to do. They still are filthy pigs, be they black or white.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/aurukun-justice-groups-disbelief-over-rape-case/2007/12/18/1197740273420.html